Search for: "STATE v. VIDAL"
Results 181 - 200
of 270
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2016, 7:18 pm
Mission Statement: The Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy (ASCE) is a non-profit, non-political organization incorporated in the state of Maryland in 1990. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm
In other words, he argued that Schrems reinforces the decision of the Court of Appeal in Vidal-Hall. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm
In other news according to the UK Supreme Court registry the appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google has been “withdrawn following agreement between the parties”. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:50 pm
Of Eng’rs, Architects & Surveyors v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 4:15 am
In Vidal v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:47 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a 10 page opinion, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Puerto Rico Juan Perez-Gimenez denied the joint motion for summary judgment in Conde-Vidal v.... [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:55 pm
Vidal-Hall, [2015] EWCA Civ 311. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:32 pm
In Vidal-Hall v Google Inc. ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) the Court of Appeal held that there can be a claim for compensation under the Data Protection Act without pecuniary loss and that misuse of private information is a tort, not an equitable wrong. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:58 am
Google’s appeal in Vidal-Hall is pending before the UK Supreme Court [but is reported to have been subsequently withdrawn]. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:58 am
Google’s appeal in Vidal-Hall is pending before the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:08 pm
Part 1 – Adrienne Page QC Case Law: OPO v James Rhodes (formerly MLA): Pianist’s book unbanned, no intention to cause distress – Dan Tench Case Law: Mosley v Google Inc, Data Protection claim against Google to go to trial – Lorna Skinner Privacy Issues in New Zealand: Sex with the Office Lights on – Nicole Moreham Case Law: Vidal-Hall v Google, Distress damages can be awarded under s 13 DPA without pecuniary loss (and misuse of… [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 3:46 am
It was argued that there had to be some damage which was limited to distress or hurt to feelings, which could be proved before damages were awarded, citing Vidal-Hall v Google Inc. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 5:51 pm
Vidal-Font’s representative cases are: Oriental Group v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Anisminic… [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm
” When there is no longer respect for human rights, public calls can only state what one hopes for. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:01 am
Blog: Temas de propiedad intelectual Víctor M. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:28 am
As demonstrated in the Georgia Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Vidal v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:28 am
As demonstrated in the Georgia Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Vidal v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:28 am
As demonstrated in the Georgia Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Vidal v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 4:22 pm
Damages Dan Tench explained how the remedies available to individuals asserting data protection rights have been widened by the landmark ruling in Google v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311, as s 13(2) of the DPA has now been disapplied and individuals are entitled to recover damages under the Act for non-material loss. [read post]
