Search for: "SUPPLEMENT TO OPINION 13" Results 181 - 200 of 975
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2023, 4:06 am
As for "discovery fraud," the Board reviewed Lego's litigation conduct in detail, considering particularly whether Lego failed to timely disclose or supplement its discovery production with its 13 letters to dictionary publishers and whether it misled Zuru regarding whether Lego had already produced all documents relating to its efforts to prevent generic use or misuse of "Lego. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:51 am
., Serial No. 90000386 (July 29, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Cynthia C. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 12:03 pm by Lee Tankle
In further support of its holding, the Court also referenced the legislative history of FICA and cited to 26 U.S.C. 3121(a)(13)(A) which exempts from “wages” severance payments provided “because of . . . retirement for disability. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 4:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
That defendant SHALL FILE a supplemental brief pertinent to his Motion To Dismiss Information [#13] filed December 2, 2009, on or before January 4, 2010; 2. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am by Jelle Hoekstra
The board sent a communication indicating its preliminary opinion that the late-filed submissions were admissible and setting a time limit for the respondent to reply thereto.IX. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am by Jelle Hoekstra
The board sent a communication indicating its preliminary opinion that the late-filed submissions were admissible and setting a time limit for the respondent to reply thereto.IX. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 8:23 pm
Texas currently has 13 executions scheduled, beginning with Karl Chamberlain two days from now. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 10:59 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
.), the Texas Supreme Court last Friday issued a brief supplemental opinion on motion for re-hearing clarifying that all discovery is not necessarily precluded when a motion to compel arbitration is filed and pending.For undivinable reasons, the original mandamus opinion in IN RE HOUSTON PIPE LINE COMPANY, ET AL (Tex. 2009) is not even cited in the one-page follow-up opinion.See prior post: Pre-Arbitration Discovery Quashed by Texas High… [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:34 am
”  Id. at *13 (this discussion is from that part of the magistrate’s opinion adopted by the district court without objection by plaintiff). [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:39 am
The jury in this case was provided a special verdict form with 13 interrogatories. [read post]