Search for: "Sacks v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2013, 4:27 pm
No, holds the 9th, because the state of the law at the time the state court decided the case was Oregon v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:46 am
Racky Ramchair certainly did.The case is Ramchair v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 10:11 am
The ruling was in error, the Second Circuit (Sack, Lohier and Kahn) holds.The Supreme Court has expressly recognized only three contexts in which a Bivens remedy is available: unreasonable search and seizure by federal officials in violation of the Fourth Amendment, Bivens, 403 U.S. 388; gender-based employment discrimination by a United States Congressman in violation of the Fifth Amendment, Davis v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
There are other holdings in this case, though.The case is Lore v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
Although the Justices are in their mid-term recess, coverage of the Court continues to focus on last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 10:04 pm
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit issued an order denying rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 10:12 pm
ObamaJewel v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
NPR’s Fresh Air discusses United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 8:45 am
Supreme Court precedent, Zinermon v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:15 am
Writing for this blog, Lyle Denniston reports on the brief filed by the state’s attorney general opposing the stay, while Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post predicts that the Justices may summarily overturn the Montana court’s decision or “at the very least” allow for full briefing and a hearing. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 9:41 am
Last week, the lowly Stanford Cardinal gained 331 yards passing and, if you exclude QB sacks, almost 100 yards rushing against UCLA's vaunted defense. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:32 am
Judge Nardini writes, "The problem with Murray’s claim is that, as the Supreme Court held in Rivera v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:53 am
United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 8:26 am
The Court ultimately says the parole officers were allowed to search a parolee's house, where they found guns and narcotics.The case is United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
The Court throws in some language about how qualified immunity is often inappropriate at the motion to dismiss stage.The case is Sabir v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 3:07 pm
They lose.The case is Selevan v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 6:53 am
The Court of Appeals affirms it all.The case is Morse v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
" [Just to state the obvious, this isn't my kind of website. [read post]
