Search for: "Sands v. Harms" Results 181 - 200 of 262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2012, 11:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Michael Shapiro, PTO: if copyright-plus claims are out, would that mean reputational harms aren’t covered? [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:50 am by Brady Iandiorio
The following post analyzes the District Court of Summit County rulings in TCD, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:54 am by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
25 years ago today, when the United States Supreme Court dealt a blow to fairness in the death penalty with its ruling in McCleskey v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm by Pace Law School Library
Critical habitat and the challenge of regulating small harms. 64 Fla. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
After a fairly extraordinary and steady expansion in the 80s and 90s, the Court retrenched in important ways and started to draw some lines in the sand. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:29 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
It’s the 21st century version of “go pound sand” — “go write something nasty in the comments. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:43 am
Sand is not a dangerous instrumentality; there is nothing about sand's very nature that makes it explicitly dangerous or harmful. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:53 am by Dan Farber
  Many people would probably name the Scenic Hudson opinion, but my nominee would be a decision many decades earlier: Woodruff v. [read post]