Search for: "Schultz v. Schultz" Results 181 - 200 of 528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2007, 9:46 pm
Schultz in the   Wall Street Journal regarding the above captioned. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 10:07 pm by Old Fox
v=pSRlRR_sA98Jonah Gldberg had this to say about the rather revealing sentiments expressed by Melissa Harris-Perry in an MSNBC “Lean Forward” clip:Before we get to all that, a word about the ad campaign itself. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 5:00 am by Michael Risch
I much prefer the categories created by Lippoldt and Schultz. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:47 am by Anushka Limaye
Ingrid Wuerth argued that, in the upcoming Jam v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 9:14 pm
Schultz, 14 F.3d 1093, 1097 (6th Cir. 1994) (holding that an officer's training and experience "cannot substitute for the lack of evidentiary nexus"), and United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:02 pm by Series of Essays
Brnovich and Its Implications September 20, 2021 | Joshua Sellers, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law The Supreme Court’s decision in Brnovich v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]