Search for: "Sears, Roebuck And Co." Results 181 - 200 of 334
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2011, 7:15 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542,1548 (Fed. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542,1548 (Fed. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:13 am by Curt Cutting
Sears, Roebuck & Co.) has nothing to do with punitive damages. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Sears, Roebuck and Co., 624 F.3d 842, rehearing denied, 627 F.3d 289 (7th Cir. 2010).) [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 624 F.3d 842 (7th Cir. 2010), wrote a blistering opinion that discussed the extortionate nature of class action suits and is likely to be frequently quoted extensively by defense counsel in the future. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:22 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Sears Roebuck & Co. is already famous for the suggestion made by plaintiffs’ counsel in oral argument that the Seventh Circuit panel’s three male judges poll their wives to see if they agreed whether the possibility that a stainless steel clothes dryer contained non-stainless components made them fearful of rust damage to their laundry. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 5:29 am by Jon Hyman
A letter from Mark Boling, Murray’s co-counsel, to Sears’s counsel, printed at the end of this opinion, illustrates the point. [read post]