Search for: "Sears Holdings, Inc." Results 181 - 200 of 214
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2009, 3:44 pm
" Please also view the Community Wealth Ventures, Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
This post is by my colleagues Gail Lees, Andrew Tulumello, Chip Nierlich, Mark Whitburn and Chris Chorba. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Sears-Roebuck & Co. (9th Cir. 2007) 505 F.3d 993, 995. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down Under) Design… [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IP Dragon) Amendments to the PRC patent law (IP Frontline)   Ethiopia Ethiopia streamlines trade mark formalities (Afro-IP) Europe Blind readers seek guarantee of access under EU copyright law (Intellectual Property Watch) CFI dismisses Philip Morris' appeal against OHIM's persistent refusal to register the shape of its cigarette packet as a community trade mark (IPKat) CFI rules PAST PERFECT not descriptive for musical recordings: TIM The International Music Company AG,… [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 11:35 am by Craig P. Niedenthal
Even the Wall Street Journal has gotten involved addressing the problem that there may be no company to hold "liable" for this problem, since the manufacturer of the bassinet, Simplicity, sold its assets to a company known as SFCA Inc. when it went out of business in April of this year. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:36 pm
In the war for retail supremacy top Sears Holding brass continue to desert faster than members of the Iraqi military. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Stewart's Plaza Pharmacy, Inc., 79 P.3d 922, 31-32 (Utah 2003), the court refused to hold the defendant strictly liable because it had "run afoul" of an FDA "policy statement" that was "by no means binding. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
FSI HOLDINGS, INC.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-06-01432-CV, 246 SW3d 796, 02-26-08)2 petitions08-0282 THE KITTEN FAMILY LIVING TRUST AND JERRY KITTEN v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., 647 A.2d 454 (N.J. 1994). [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]