Search for: "Second Nature Designs Ltd. v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2011, 10:43 am
Langdell was a United States resident and the first and second defendant companies were incorporated in the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
Bloomsbury International Ltd v Sea Fish Industry Authority and DEFRA [2011] UKSC 25 has its origins in a claim brought by importers unhappy with the imposition of a levy. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:58 pm
United States Surgical Corp., 147 F.3d 1374, 1376 (Fed. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm by Michael O'Brien
  Next to speak on the matter was Judge Richard Posner, sitting by designation in Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Status of Religious Arbitration in the United States and Canada Nicholas Walter Abstract: This paper discusses, and challenges, the status of religious arbitration in the United States and Canada. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:08 am by Stefanie Levine
Another forum seeing an increase in use is the United States Patent & Trademark Office. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Yeti By Molly Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:21 am by Adam Baker
Enterprises Ltd. v Defence Construction (1951) Ltd., [1994] 164 AR 399 (ABQB), affd [1997] 196 AR 124 (ABCA), revd [1999] 1 SCR 619, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/1999/1999scr1-619/1999scr1-619.html Facts The respondent, Defence Construction (‘Defence’), invited tenders for construction of a water pumping and distribution system on a Canadian Forces Base in Alberta. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:21 am by Adam Baker
Enterprises Ltd. v Defence Construction (1951) Ltd., [1994] 164 AR 399 (ABQB), affd [1997] 196 AR 124 (ABCA), revd [1999] 1 SCR 619, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/1999/1999scr1-619/1999scr1-619.html Facts The respondent, Defence Construction (‘Defence’), invited tenders for construction of a water pumping and distribution system on a Canadian Forces Base in Alberta. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 pm
See Ricoh Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:04 pm
The judgment of the Supreme Court in Iridium India Telecom Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am by Kelly
LightAir (EPLAW) Switzerland Madonna: no mercy from the highest court (of Switzerland) (Class 46) UAE Bahrain – new Implementing Regs enter force (Class 99) United Kingdom Collecting from charity to be balanced against collecting for charity – new deal between charities and music creators (1709 Blog) The PCC Page, no.5: taking a look at the road map (PatLit) UK: Mr Ian Hargreaves to lead independent review into how IP system can better drive growth and innovation (IP:JUR) (Class… [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:13 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
Patel Engineering Ltd. and Another, dealing with the nature of the function of the Chief Justice under section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and also the consequent observations like the arbitration is costly. [read post]