Search for: "Security Mortgage Co. v. Powers" Results 181 - 193 of 193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
The principal areas of focus for the SEC investigations include (1) the methodologies for valuating mortgage-backed securities; (2) whether firms valued their own mortgage-backed securities differently than those held by customers; (3) whether there was proper disclosure of the valuations of mortgage-backed securities portfolios and subprime mortgage exposure; and (4) insider trading. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 12, 2009)(Unpub)Reversing dismissal of fem projectionist's sex harass-by-male-supervisor claim but affirming dismissal of co-worker sex harass and constructive discharge claims> Trujillo v BOE of Albuquerque, No. 08-2029 (10th Cir. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 4:20 am
Rating Agency Defendants The Morgan Stanley case is not the first subprime securities lawsuit naming the rating agencies as co-defendants. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:16 pm
On 12 March Ms Barrett secured an appointment with Messers Gan & Co, and she was told she should ‘forget trying to bring an appeal’. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 7:40 pm
Forged Powers of Attorney therefore are an easy means of perpetrating mortgage fraud. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 3:01 pm
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeals decided an issue quite pertinent to today's foreclosure environment in the case of StateStreetBank and Trust Co., Trustee for Holders of Bear Stearns Mortgage Securities, Inc. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 7:20 am
    Worst Government Moment:  Pick one:  Treatment of our telephone system or the voluntary program to bring together stratified Collateral-Backed-Mortgage-Securities lenders and subprime borrowers in default. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Even if Albany finally passes a salary adjustment, without passage of a meaningful retroactive adjustment, many judges will still be in the rabbit hole, having accumulated debt from rising rents, mortgages and college tuition. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
The domain name and network security company recently announced it was taking a $160 million charge due to stock option improprieties. [read post]