Search for: "Seventh Judicial District Court" Results 181 - 200 of 1,265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2008, 3:57 pm
Juries decide cases, not issues of judicial traffic control. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 8:27 am
Finally, judicial efficiency counsels to recognize the theory as litigating the same case in one court is preferable to litigating the same case in two different courts. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
In a succinct April 15, 2024, opinion written for a two-judge panel (the third panel judge having died following oral argument), the Seventh Circuit vacated the district court’s orders, remanded the case for further proceedings in light of the appellate court’s ruling, and directed the district court to permit Frank to intervene. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 6:09 am by Joy Waltemath
As a general rule, explained the Seventh Circuit, federal district courts avoid “interference with the process of each other,” though they may enjoin parties from pursuing duplicative litigation in another district and the Supreme Court has allowed them “ample” discretion to resolve such issues, giving regard to conserving judicial resources and considering equitable factors. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 5:35 am
" Turning to plaintiff's supplemental state law claims, the panel struck a blow for judicial efficiency by affirming the district court's determination to stay the Maryland fiduciary claims. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:29 am by Jeremy Gordon
The court next looks for support for its interpretation in judicial precedent. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 5:58 pm by Samuel Bray
DOL, the Fifth Circuit case about contempt sanctions against plaintiffs' attorneys for bringing suits that the district court considered inconsistent with its national injunction. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm by Michael Dimino
In his brief on the merits, Young argues that Section 3584 should not be read as a limited grant of power to district courts. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Sarah Andropoulos
In incorporating a legal standard for judicial notice under Rule 2.9(C), Opinion 478 references Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE) 201, which permits judicial notice of facts that are “not subject to reasonable dispute” for one of two reasons: either they are “generally known within the trial court’s jurisdiction,” (e.g., the sky is blue) or they “can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be… [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 1:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The July 16 Opinion In a short eight-page opinion written by Chief Judge Easterbrook for a unanimous three-judge panel, the Seventh Circuit, applying Illinois law, affirmed the district court on both issues. [read post]
7 May 2015, 10:11 am by Terese Connolly and Mikela Sutrina
  The District Court held that it could review the adequacy of the EEOC’s conciliation efforts but granted leave for an immediate appeal. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 6:02 am by Steve Parker
Both Lucia’s and Cochran’s challenges were dismissed by district courts and are now on appeal. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
The agency argued that the Court has long held these types of proceedings to be consistent with the Seventh Amendment. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 10:37 am
And it is also common for a district court to label such a document a singular “order,” as the district court did here. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 6:53 am by John Jascob
The federal district court in Milwaukee dismissed the constitutional challenge, and the Seventh Circuit affirmed the decision, finding that Bebo will have adequate opportunity for meaningful judicial review if the Commission issues a final adverse order. [read post]