Search for: "Seymour v. Seymour" Results 181 - 200 of 209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360)   Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons)     Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 4:02 am
Their application was transferred to the High Court and there refused by HHJ Seymour QC. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 1:10 pm
Summary of Decision issued June 5, 2008Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Seymour v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
Johns, MI 48879-2423 Phone: (989) 224-0333 (V/TTY); (800) 274-7426 (Toll Free) E-mail: matr@edzone.net Web: http://www.cenmi.org/matr Michigan Telework Loan Fund C/O U.C.P. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 7:48 am
Box 308 Yorktown, IN 47396 Phone: (800) 589-1121 (Toll Free) Web: http://www.area6.org Bureau of Aging and In-Home Services 402 West Washington Street, E-431 Indianapolis, IN 46207 Phone: (317) 232-7020; (800) 352-4800 (Toll Free) Fax: (317) 233-3475 Web: http://www.state.in.us/fssa/elderly/aging/index.html AARP Indiana One North Capitol Avenue, Suite 1275 Indianapolis, IN 46204-2025 Phone: (317) 423-2277 Fax: (317) 423-2211 or 2299 E-mail: inaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.orgstates/in … [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
Springfield, IL 62704 Phone: (217) 782-9696 (V/TTY) Fax: (217) 524-5339 Web: http://www.state.il.usagency/ipcdd Down Syndrome Down Syndrome Development Counsel P.O. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 5:03 am
"Last term saw the Court eroding the rights defendants have under habeas corpus, and for the first time since Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 11:01 am
We affirm, concluding that although the trial court found improper aggravating circumstances and failed to find a mitigating circumstance, the sixty-five-year sentence is still proper, and that the sentence is also not inappropriate.NFP civil opinions today (3): In Seymour Lodge No. 462, et al v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 5:17 pm
The dissenters were practically running around with their hair on fire saying that there was no way to reconcile the decision with the 2000 decision in Nebraska v. [read post]