Search for: "Sharpe v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2007, 7:33 am
Bush v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:49 pm
Finally, the Supreme Court has not really taken a significant state sovereign immunity case since Justice O'Connor's parting gift in Central Virginia Community College v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 12:58 pm
The ruling in State of Ohio v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:11 pm
Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging) In a recent posting, Ilya Somin says the following: “Beginning with the famous case of Bolling v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 12:38 pm
Paddlety (Muscogee (Creek) Nation Constitution; Oklahoma's "Stand your Ground" law) Sharp v. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 4:05 am
In Jarrard v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:47 pm
Although it is not so stated in the judgment, presumably David Price submitted that this principle applies even where the first article is on the front page, and the second article is elsewhere in the paper. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 7:56 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:35 am
S. law in the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:19 am
While the precise words used and the names of the persons to whom they were spoken (and when) must, so far as possible, be set out in the Particulars of Claim if not already contained in the Claim Form (CPR PD 53 para 2.4) the Court confirmed the narrow exception summarised by Sharp J in Freer v Zeb & Ors [2008] EWHC 212 (QB) [31]. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 12:07 pm
The reports did not say or imply that the entire $3 million in state funds had been misappropriated or embezzled," Justice Sharp wrote. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
On appeal to the supreme court of the state, the judgment was affirmed [. . .].'” 1921—Kirby v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 1:19 pm
Robert Andrew Sharp v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to bar within a matter of hours--ex parte, i.e., without a hearing--Avanci, Nokia, Sharp, Conversant (which has very recently become the third and latest Avanci member to sue Daimler for patent infringement, as I reported earlier today), and Optis from seeking another AAII against Continental in Germany.Today's TRO motion renews the original pursuit of a U.S. antisuit injunction against those… [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:08 pm
Snyder v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am
Schuette v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 11:03 am
Summary of Decision issued November 5, 2008Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Sharp v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm
" Skidmore v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 8:25 pm
” McClay v. [read post]
