Search for: "Shelby County Government" Results 181 - 200 of 495
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2017, 7:44 am by Steven Schwinn
But given the way this court has ruled in recent federalism cases (like Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 7:38 am by NCC Staff
However, the 2013 Supreme Court decision of Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Simultaneously, in constructing a principle of equal sovereignty, the Supreme Court’s recent Shelby County decision relied on equal footing cases that ignored this early history. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 5:41 pm by Maseeh Moradi
Gore (2000), Citizens United (2010), and Shelby County (2013) underscore that—he has shown a propensity for independent thinking and an ability to push back against a Republican president (see Hamdi (2004), Hamdan (2006), and Boumediene (2008)). [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
Menon, the court ruled on Monday that the Hague Service Convention, which governs service of process across international boundaries, permits service of process by mail. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:26 am by Kate Howard
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 16-833 Issues: (1) Whether a federal court has the authority to re-impose, under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the same “anti-retrogression” preclearance standard invalidated as to Section 5 by Shelby County v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am by John Elwood
The San Diego County Sheriff, however, defines “good cause” to require a showing of a particularized need for self-defense. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John Elwood
Patchak, which held that the government had waived sovereign immunity so that a suit challenging the Department of the Interior’s action taking a certain plot of land into trust for an Indian tribe could proceed. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 7:59 am by Kate Howard
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 16-833 Issues: (1) Whether a federal court has the authority to reimpose, under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the same “anti-retrogression” preclearance standard invalidated as to Section 5 by Shelby County v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
You will recall that a few years back in Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am by Eric Goldman
I’ll list all of the briefs and highlight some of the more noteworthy aspects of certain briefs: * Amicus Brief: ACLU-NC, ACLU of San Diego/Imperial Counties, ACLU-SC, Avvo, California Anti-SLAPP Project, EFF, First Amendment Coalition and Public Participation Project. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Kate Howard
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 16-833 Issues: (1) Whether a federal court has the authority to reimpose, under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the same “anti-retrogression” preclearance standard invalidated as to Section 5 by Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 5:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
At issue now, as it was when the Supreme Court decided the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 12:53 pm by Stephen Griffin
  As Joseph Fishkin points out with respect to Shelby County, the legacies of the Civil War and Reconstruction are still with us when the Court uses doctrines such as the “equal dignity” of states. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 5:18 am by Heather K. Gerken
  The nationalists have lost battles, to be sure — Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am by Randy Barnett
Valeo (for ruling out the possibility that legislatures could develop reasonable campaign finance rules promoting small-r republicanism), Casey (for the “undue burden” test), and Shelby County. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 7:35 pm
"Voting Rights in the Age of Trump": In yesterday's edition of The New York Times, Ari Berman had an op-ed that begins, "In June 2013, the Supreme Court ruled in Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Brennan Center for Justice, Andrew Cohen looks at voter suppression efforts in the wake of the court’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:30 am
Many of these changes took place in 2013 in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County, which allowed states to pass election laws without preclearance from the federal government. [read post]