Search for: "Shields v. United States of America" Results 181 - 200 of 325
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-5756, is a spin-off of last Term’s Johnson v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 11:16 am by Cody M. Poplin
And while the United States is still floundering for a strategy, the United Kingdom just released its own public strategy to combat the Islamic State. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:37 am by Native American Rights Fund
United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlBorrichio v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:55 am by Scott Bomboy
But in 1990, the Court struck down that law as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:28 am by Arkady Bukh
With the Second World War winding down, von Braun surrendered to the Americans and moved his rocket building team, and talents, to the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  On June 26, 2013, when the Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Common Cause investigated how the religious right fought for the deregulation of political spending, and won in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm by Ray Dowd
 The Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act of 1909 cleared the way for America’s wealthiest citizens to import a vast collection of European art into the United States tax-free. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
This post reviews some of the highlights of the court battles of 2014 in Canada and other Commonwealth countries, the United States and the European Union. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
  The allegations, as discussed in United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 4:37 pm
The 6th Circuit still leaves the courts looking into the minds of religionists and assessing the religiosity of their motivations, when it would be better to be "done with this business of judicially examining other people's faiths" (to quote the last line of my all-time favorite judicial opinion, Justice Jackson dissenting in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
It would be much like fictional Byron Carlos Johnson’s undertaking in Paul Batista’s Extraordinary Rendition, except Johnson was working in the United States of America. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am by Marty Lederman
  Take the religious objection to the federal minimum wage at issue in Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. [read post]