Search for: "Shorts v. Superior Court"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2012, 8:30 am
The trial court (Imperial County Superior, Judge Jeffrey B. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:24 am
Cornett v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 8:27 am
This was in Superior Court in Worcester entitled Harrington v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
But in Aaron v. [read post]
Recent Hague Convention District Court Cases - Esparza v Nares, 2022 WL 17724414 ( S.D. Texas, 2022)
20 Dec 2022, 7:42 am
The court noted that he was “highly defensive,... he spoke in a short and cut manner in a low monotone and kept his eyes cast downward. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:08 pm
Marshall v. [read post]
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Splits On Extension of Tort of Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
1 Jan 2012, 6:37 pm
Now, with Toney v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am
Rohrbaugh, the Superior Court held that its previous decision in the case of Pusl v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 10:52 pm
In short, the California Supreme Court focused on whether to continue using the Borello test and on what test, if any, to apply instead. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 10:44 am
That should be every employer’s mantra following the recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court in McGuinty v. 1845035 Ontario Inc. [read post]
Case Law, Canada: Baglow v Smith, defence of “fair comment” succeeds in landmark blogging libel case
4 Mar 2015, 4:50 pm
In a judgment handed down on 23 February 2015 ( [2015] ONSC 1175), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice held that the operators of a right wing message board were publishers of defamatory material concerning a left wing blogger. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:40 am
Georgia Gwinnett County Superior Court Judge Tracie Cason's decision last week in Walters v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:56 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 9:07 pm
In Lancaster v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:48 am
Furthermore, under Rule 8(a)(2), a pleading must contain "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 2:46 pm
There might be other circumstances where a court would hold, e.g., that the officer had apparent authority to sign larger contracts.Another big issue is the principal's liability for torts of an agent.The law of respondeat superior is not particularly clear - be especially ready to argue both sides. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
On December 14, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Simpkins v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm
”—United States v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 7:00 am
Superior Court, 42 Cal. 4th 443, 457-59, 462, 464-65 (2007), instructive. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:00 am
Supreme Court decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
