Search for: "Smith v. Stevens" Results 181 - 200 of 853
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See e.g., Leff v Fulbright & aworski, L.L.P., 78 AD3d 531, 533 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 17 NY3d 705 [2011] [damages in malpractice case “grossly speculative” where plaintiff could not establish what would have occurred but for defendants’ conduct]; Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Grp. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 9:35 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” At Procedurally Taxing, Carlton Smith considers the implications for tax law of the Supreme Court’s decision in Fort Bend County v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie looks at Klein v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:55 am
Smith (EY Center for Board Matters) and Joe Dettmann (Ernst & Young LLP), on Wednesday, April 24, 2019 Tags: Accountability, Board oversight, Boards of Directors, Corporate culture, Human capital, Management, Oversight, Stakeholders Claims Based on Warranty and Indemnity Liability (W&I) Policies Posted by Joseph A. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
First up is United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
First Woman to Lead a Top 10 Law Firm in England and Wales, Lesley MacDonagh, 1995 Steven Vaughan68. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) (upholding criminalization of obscenity); Smith v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) (upholding criminalization of obscenity); Smith v. [read post]