Search for: "Smith v. Kelly"
Results 181 - 200
of 279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:20 pm
Kelly M. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
Smith Water Prods. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm
Mr Roberts-Smith is suing The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald over reports he allegedly committed murder on an overseas deployment. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 2:19 am
Sargent 1990 Living Trust V. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:49 pm
But see generally, Kelly v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Appellate Division, First Department In proceeding to establish standing to assert parental rights in seeking visitation under Domestic Relations Law § 70, the court has the discretion to direct “more monied” party to pay the other party’s counsel fee In Kelly G v Circe H, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2019 WL 6869009 (1stDept.,2019), the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for… [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Smith , No. 08-1477 Sentence for distribution of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant defendant a continuance for another chance to present expert testimony; 2) the district court correctly applied 18 U.S.C. sec. 3553 (a) when sentencing defendant, and did not fail to adequately address the factors set forth in the statute; and 3) there is no evidence that the district court's tangential statements about early… [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm
Next Week in the Courts On 21 September 2010 Thorpe and Smith LJJ will hear a renewed oral hearing for permission to appeal [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am
Recently: Kelly v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 9:55 am
Review of Robert Wood's article "Factor v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:13 am
§ 501.211(1); see also Kelly v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Supreme Court case Atkins v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:24 am
In Krimstock v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia The Defamation claim brought by Ben Roberts-Smith, the war veteran accused of committing war crimes by the Defendant newspapers, continues. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Benedict Mawn v 89. [read post]
