Search for: "Smith v. Vice" Results 181 - 200 of 457
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2018, 2:16 pm by Michael Madison
” [Part I, here] [Part II, here] [Part III, here] [Part IV, here] [Part V, here] [And the piece in full, as a single document, from SSRN] The symposium is organized under the “2018 Symposium: Future of Legal Ed” tag. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Smith, Vice President, Litigation & Strategy, Campaign Legal Center, formerly with Jenner & Block LLPPanelists, Beth Brinkmann, Covington & Burling, formerly Deputy Assistant Attorney General in charge of appeals, Civil Division, U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:02 am by NCC Staff
  But as Rehnquist later pointed out,  Marshall won three other major civil rights cases at the Court before Brown:  Smith v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:18 pm
The EU's Press Release announced the visit this way:The High Representative/Vice President Federica Mogherini will travel to Cuba on 3-4 January, reconfirming the strong EU-Cuban relationship. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm by Marty Lederman
”  I believe Justice Gorsuch was referring to a comment made by Vice-Chair Raju Jairim at the Commission hearing on May 30, 2014, in which the Commission was reviewing the summary judgment (see Pet. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 6:44 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada rendered it judgment in Cowper-Smith v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:24 am by Andrew Hamm
Smith … was turned down … because some time in the remote past he suffered from a venereal disease. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Andrew Koppelman
  He talked David into being the Libertarian vice presidential candidate in 1980, because he was too busy running the family company to do it.) [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) Several months ago I posted a draft syllabus for a new course on Corporate Social Responsibility (Corporate Social Responsibility Law--A Tentative Syllabus). [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 7:20 am by Jim Harper
But the “third-party doctrine” as found in Smith v. [read post]