Search for: "Snowden v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2016, 9:38 am
But according to the Supreme Court’s decision in Freedman v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 10:37 am
General Michael V. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
’ On Internet Policy Review Monika Ermet looks at European cases against government surveillance in the wake of the Snowden revelations. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:45 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 10:29 am
This is in response to the CJEU case of Maximiliam Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner, which declared invalid the previous agreement called Safe Harbor (our take on the case here). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:51 am
Europe isn’t the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 1:52 pm
But amidst the intense focus on Reno v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:54 am
In Barrett v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:31 pm
On 19 January 2016 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (on application of Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 9:15 am
So a spy agency's cartoon depicting total world domination was an untimely public relations failure given the focus Snowden was bringing to the US surveillance state. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 7:17 am
For every negative thing the author states, another poster could state the opposite with equal conviction and neither would be a provable fact. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 8:19 am
Corp. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
Five years after we filed Jewel, and responding to further revelations in 2013 by whistleblower Edward Snowden, we filed First Unitarian Church v NSA on behalf of nearly two dozen organizations from across the political spectrum. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 pm
Any order requiring any sort of journalistic material to be handed over to the state engages the right to freedom of expression of publishers and broadcasters under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and will amount to an interference for the purposes of Article 10 (see eg Handyside v United Kingdom and Tillack v Belgium). [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 4:33 pm
On 4 December 2015, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) handed down judgment in the case of Roman Zakharov v Russia ([2015] ECHR 1065). [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am
His interpretation of the Annex contradicts the most basic cannon of treaty interpretation under the Vienna Convention on the law of treaties, which states in Article 31 that “A treaty shall be interpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in their context and in the light of its object and purpose. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
” Ireland The judgment in the remarkable defamation case of Christie v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:45 am
Snowden have shown. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Anisminic… [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:15 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), in the matter of Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
