Search for: "South Carolina v. Georgia" Results 181 - 200 of 585
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2019, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In 1777, the Executive Council of Georgia had authorized the purchase of supplies from a South Carolina businessman. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 9:41 pm by Sam Brunson
What happened is this: on April 26, 2018, the Attorney General of Michigan signed onto an amicus brief with the states of Wisconsin, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
Georgia, Hawaii, and South Carolina legislatively decoupled from the inclusion of GILTI in the tax base. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 2:47 pm by Jennifer E. Benda
The easement syndicates involved properties located in Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Caroline, Tennessee, and Texas. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 1:00 pm
Similar contract requirements are on the books in Georgia, Arkansas, Minnesota, Texas, Ohio, Alabama, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Nevada, South Carolina, Rhode Island, Florida, Maryland, and Wisconsin. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am by Joyce Kung
District Court for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Division, issued a nationwide injunction to the Trump administration’s so-called “Suspension Rule,” which called for the delayed effective date of the Obama-era “waters of the United States rule” (or “WOTUS Rule”). [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 5:03 am by Greg Lukianoff
The facts of Abbott arose at the University of South Carolina in the fall of 2015. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
Senators Howard Metzenbaum found a powerful cosponsor for his gun ban: South Carolina Republican Strom Thurmond. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
Complete Auto Remains the Rule, As Modified by Wayfair The South Dakota v. [read post]