Search for: "South Dakota v. Robert"
Results 181 - 200
of 246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2012, 8:16 am
That is how the challengers could so effectively argue that if the Medicaid expansion did not run afoul of South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Bell, 649 N.W. 2d 243, 252 (N.D. 2002) (noting the legislature amended North Dakota’s drug laws in 1989 to include the culpability requirement of “willfully” as an element of the offense of possession of a controlled substance, thereby eliminating possession as a strict liability offense); State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
Davis (1937) and South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:31 pm
” The Supreme Court had indicated that “coercive” conditional grants are unconstitutional as far back as the 1930s, and reiterated that point in South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
This clarifies an aspect of South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:26 am
The states argued that this constituted impermissible coercion, but that argument was rejected by the Supreme Cour three years later in South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:19 pm
In contrast, the monies are issue in South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:40 am
This strikes me as a fairly reasonable gloss on the case of South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:05 am
If that doesn’t happen, the Medicaid case is going to be an extremely important ruling no matter who wins; probably the most important Spending Clause case since the 1930s, or at least since South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 2:59 am
Everybody old enough to remember Robert Kennedy's campaign for President can recall his visit to areas of Mississippi to see that hunger in America looked a lot like hunger in Africa.What came from that historic field trip was the Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs, which existed from 1968 to 1977, with only one chairman, Senator McGovern of South Dakota. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:24 pm
Circuit courts in the 7th (covering Illinois, Wisconsin and Indiana), 8th (covering Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota) and 9th (covering Alaska, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, the Mariana Islands, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington) all ruled prior to the Supreme Court case that warrantless GPS tracking was legal. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:19 pm
Robert Goldman, American University, EEUU91. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:12 am
” South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
Dole, but I note that South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
The South Dakota U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Jordan’s conduct and his South Dakota pretrial diversion deal to Judge Lacey Collier and Robert Ignasiak’s defense team for the first time. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:10 am
In Bair et al. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:26 am
When Chief Justice Rehnquist authored South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
L. 591-632 (2011).Percival, Robert V. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition Amicus brief of New Tribes MissionAmicus brief of Utah Sheriffs' Association Amicus brief of the Foundation for Moral LawAmicus brief of the Becket Fund for Religious LibertyAmicus brief of Robert E. [read post]
