Search for: "Southern v. USA" Results 181 - 200 of 695
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2016, 11:33 am
This federal lawsuit, commenced in the Southern District of Indiana, lists two Defendants, Cipla Limited of Mumbai, India and its wholly owned subsidiary Cipla USA, Inc. of Miami, Florida. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:11 am by Yishai Schwartz
But in an opinion by Judge John Koetl (sitting by designation from the Southern District of New York and joined by Circuit judges Pierre Leval and Christopher Droney), the Second Circuit has now vacated the judgment, holding that the litigation failed the Supreme Court’s test for personal jurisdiction developed in Daimler AG v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 8:49 am by Audrey A Millemann
  The Supreme Court then decided Commil USA, LLC v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 10:18 pm by ligitsec
On October 14, Judge Denise Cote of the Southern District of New York ruled that a cell phone service provider does not need a public performance license when it provides ringtones to its customers. [read post]
27 May 2016, 10:18 pm by ligitsec
On October 14, Judge Denise Cote of the Southern District of New York ruled that a cell phone service provider does not need a public performance license when it provides ringtones to its customers. [read post]
25 May 2016, 1:39 pm by Olivier Moréteau
Odinet, Southern University (United States)II.B         L’absence de modèle unique : l’uniformisation en question·         Entre unité et diversité : la construction d’un droit des biens transsystémique, Yaëll Emerich, Université McGill (Canada)·         Harmoniser la… [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  John Reed Stark Many of us have been following the continuing battle between Apple and the U.S. government on whether the government can required the company to unlock the iPhone of the San Bernardino terrorist, Syed Rizwan Farook, with a combination of confusion and concern. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm by Ron Coleman
  She voted to affirm the decision in a case reported on here, PRL USA Holdings v. [read post]