Search for: "Standard v. Shine"
Results 181 - 200
of 303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2015, 5:06 pm
Costs up to the expiry of the Part 36 offer on a standard basis and from the expiry of the Part 36 offer onwards on an indemnity basis, and interest on those costs at 5.5 per cent. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 10:00 am
TSCC 1908 v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:04 pm
The ruling is made that much worse because the Court had before it an example of how the situation should have been handled, in the case of NCTQ v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:30 pm
In Dickinson v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
In other words, rules tend to be “opaque” to their underlying justifications, while principles allow their justifications to shine through. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 11:31 am
The solution to managing these types of mass actions is surely not that the standard of care diminishes as the number of cases grows. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:41 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 5:54 am
This standard was announced by the New York Court of Appeals in the landmark case of Bennet v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:37 am
Case citation: Opperman v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:13 pm
The decision Friday in Wright v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:30 am
The case was Simpson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 4:35 am
World Restoration, and a more recent WCAB panel opinion in Weilmann v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm
Other repairs poorly carried out or to poor standard. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm
Other repairs poorly carried out or to poor standard. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 12:38 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 7:12 am
The court says this standard is easily satisfied here. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 10:14 am
CVS Caremark Men’s Journal Beats Lawsuit Alleging Violation of California’s “Shine the Light” Privacy Statute — Boorstein v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 10:27 am
This wasn’t a new legal conclusion, but Judge Grewal makes the standard very clear. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:55 am
This was the issue addressed by the bankruptcy court in Paloian v. [read post]
