Search for: "Starr v State"
Results 181 - 200
of 753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2016, 10:59 am
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:39 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:12 pm
Rev. 301-356.Here is the abstract: The shift in sentencing fact-finding responsibility triggered in many states by Blakely v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 7:34 am
However, this case, like the litigation brought by Freddie Starr, should be a warning against taking such robust action when doing so may harm your reputation further. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
Lexis 44691, [p. 6]; Starr-Gordon v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 3:12 pm
California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
(Masonite Corporation Dist. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
In a 46-page majority opinion written by Justice Chin and joined by four other justices, punctuated by an 18-page concurring opinion (by Justice Liu, joined by Justice Werdegar) which reads like a dissent, the California Supreme Court reversed the First District Court of Appeal’s judgment in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 2:40 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
25 May 2009, 2:48 am
She faults these arguments for their (unintended) consequences, just as she faults the effect on impoverished women of the limitations of the privacy argument for Roe v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:52 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:25 am
The case is CBIA v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 11:34 am
(See North Coast Rivers Alliance v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 8:04 am
In the first case, Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Co. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:35 am
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:41 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
The plaintiffs in Jane Doe v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
The plaintiffs in Jane Doe v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am
Judge Brantley Starr’s decision in Bowman v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am
Judge Brantley Starr’s decision in Bowman v. [read post]
