Search for: "Starr v State" Results 181 - 200 of 759
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Sixth District Holds City Of San Jose’s Action In Seeking And Accepting Streambed Alteration Agreement From California Department Of Fish And Wildlife Is Not New Discretionary Approval For City’s Historic Trestle Demolition/Bridge Construction Project, And Thus Does Not Trigger Subsequent CEQA Review
22 May 2020, 1:21 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Willow Glen Trestle Conservancy v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Back To CEQA Basics: Second District Teaches That CEQA Requires Judicial Deference To Lead Agency’s Chosen Baseline, Failure To Administratively Exhaust “Exact Issue” Results In Forfeiture, And An EIR Is Not Faulty For Omitting Immaterial Information
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
California Supreme Court Grants Review of Third District Decision Involving FERC Relicensing of State’s Oroville Hydroelectric Dam Project To Decide Extent To Which Federal Power Act Preempts CEQA; Merits Briefing Underway
20 Apr 2020, 9:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Second District Reaffirms Rule That Filing of Facially Valid NOD Triggers Short CEQA Statute of Limitations And Plaintiff May Not “Go Behind” Agency’s Declarations In Document To Challenge Validity of Project Approval
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (Citing County of Amador v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
[Josh Blackman] The Federal Government's "Police Power" and the Takings Clause: Part I
6 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
In Arizona v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Once More Into the “Brambled Thicket”: Fourth District Reverses Ruling Sustaining Demurrer to Action Challenging Caltrans’ Claim of Statutory CEQA Exemption For Freeway Interchange Project, Holds Streets and Highways Code § 103’s Coastal Commission Exemption Does Not Apply And That Petition Adequately Pleaded Estoppel Against Caltrans to Assert 35-Day Statute of Limitations Based on NOE Filing
1 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Citizens for a Responsible Caltrans Decision v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
[Josh Blackman] District Court Finds Bump Stock Ban May Constitute a Taking, Because the Federal Government Lacks a Police Power
31 Mar 2020, 3:22 pm by Josh Blackman
Here is the introduction from Lane v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Second District Affirms Judgment Invalidating City of Agoura Hills’ Mixed-Use Project Approvals and Related MND Based On CEQA and Local Oak Tree Ordinance Violations
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm by Arthur F. Coon
State Water Resources (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 342, 359; Bridges v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Spring CEQA Roundup – 2020
23 Mar 2020, 10:56 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (Citing, e.g., Rich v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Symposium: Vance, Mazars, Deutsche Bank: Is the president above the law after all?
11 Mar 2020, 7:14 am by Neil Kinkopf
Trump v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Third District Affirms Judgment Rejecting CEQA Challenges To EIR For Cordova Hills Master Planned Community Project
6 Mar 2020, 2:54 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Environmental Council of Sacramento v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fifth District Holds EIR For Kern County’s Ministerial Oil and Gas Well Permitting Ordinance Violates CEQA Due To Improperly Deferred Mitigation For Water Supply Impacts, Inadequate Mitigation For Farmland Conversion, And Inadequate Analysis of Noise Impacts
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  King and Gardiner Farms, LLC v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Options for Dealing with a Sitting President
3 Feb 2020, 12:38 pm by Melanie Fontes
 United States v. [read post]
Harvard Law and Policy Review - http://harvardlpr.com/
Fourth District Upholds CEQA Class 32 Infill Exemption For Small Residential Condo Project On Environmentally Sensitive Lands As Consistent With San Diego’s General Plan Despite Failure To Meet Recommended Minimum Density
16 Jan 2020, 1:39 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Holden v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The Trump Impeachment and the Question of Precedent
16 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Bob Bauer
The House action was “purely partisan,” he stated, and a “partisan crusade. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
“ROG Won: A CEQA Wars Story” – Third District Holds Geothermal Energy Project EIR’s Rejection Of Proposed Mitigation Measures For Significant ROG Fugitive Emissions Impact Violated CEQA Where No Substantial Evidence Showed Measures’ Infeasibility
3 Jan 2020, 3:29 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Russel Covington, et al v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Out With The Old (And In With The New … Next Year)! – Third District Rejects CEQA And General Plan Consistency Challenges to Sacramento’s 2035 General Plan Update And Related EIR, Holds Traffic Analysis Challenge Based On Lowering of Acceptable LOS Is Mooted By Public Resources Code § 20199, But New VMT Standard Doesn’t Yet Apply
23 Dec 2019, 1:36 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
How To Frame Someone For a Drug Offense
10 Dec 2019, 11:31 am by The Law Office of John Guidry II
Over twenty years ago, in the case of Starr v. [read post]
Orlando Criminal Defense Attorney Blog - http://www.orlandocriminaldefenseattorneyblog.com/
New Illinois Supreme Court Trigger Rule for CGL Personal Injury “Offenses” Could Have Costly Consequences for Policyholders
10 Dec 2019, 6:51 am by Michael S. Levine and Kevin V. Small
The Illinois Supreme Court’s recent decision in Sanders v. [read post]
Hunton Insurance Recovery Blog - https://www.huntoninsurancerecoveryblog.com/
Revisiting Criminal Obstruction of Justice in the Impeachment Inquiry
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Masha Simonova
” The refusal to cooperate is a matter of stated policy. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/