Search for: "State Court District 1"
Results 181 - 200
of 48,485
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm
Although the information in this publication is relevant to our retail fraud practice in Macomb County, I would say that the vast majority of the retail fraud cases that we handle in the 42-1 District Court occur at the Meijer store located in Washington Township on the northeast corner of 26 Mile and Van Dyke. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 4:25 am
§7206(1).HELD: District court erred by determining sentence solely on basis that guideline-based sentences are presumptively reasonable and that defendant had failed to rebut that presumption. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:39 am
United States Magistrate Judge Jan M. [read post]
3 May 2007, 8:19 am
Blog entry by K&L Gates posted on electronic discovery law, May 1, 2007: “At least 28 United States District Courts have enacted special rules addressing electronic discovery. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:09 pm
Typically, Rule 11(c)(1)(C) agreements explicitly contain an agreed-upon sentence, e.g., United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 5:49 am
State, the Colorado Supreme Court held that its constitutional mandate that specifically requires annual increases in "statewide base per pupil funding" does not prohibit the state from reducing the total amount of funds per pupil it provides to school districts. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:34 pm
The court was similarly unswayed by this argument, stating that the court would "not hear appeals from other district courts. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:08 pm
United States District Court Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz (Southern District of California) certified a class of newspaper home delivery carriers classified as independent contractors by Lee Publications, Inc. but alleging their status as employees of Lee Publications. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 8:48 am
District Court 1:08-CV-00155 (filed March 18, 2008).A group of eighteen states and the District of Columbia filed a complaint in Delaware District Court against Abbot Laboratories, Fournier Industrie et Sante and Laboratoires Fournier S.A. under the Sherman Act, alleging an unlawful monopolization of the fenofibrate market. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 9:24 pm
Armand-Hosang, the Fourth District Court of Appeal clarified its perspective on two points: 1) what is considered sufficient evidence to prove past medical expenses and 2) how to deal with admission of expert testimony that does not conform to the court’s trial order. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:36 pm
Judge Dennis Leduc is the presiding judge of the 42-1 District Court. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
The District Court noted that Pew v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 8:33 am
The court thus concluded that claim 1 and its dependent claims were invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 4:41 am
§ § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A).HELD: District court erred by awarding one point sentence reduction for defendant's acceptance of responsibility under USSG § 3E1.1, and error was not harmless. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:19 am
United States District Court Judge William Alsup (Northern District of California) denied a motion by defendant P.F.Chang's China Bistro, Inc. to transfer a putative wage & hour class action to the Central District of California. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 2:29 pm
State Court If you’ve been charged with a federal crime, it’s important to recognize that federal court is not the same as state court. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 5:16 am
§ § 1326(a)(1), (a)(2) and (b)(2).HELD: District court is not required to discuss applicability of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 6:25 am
Gunter, 462 F.3d 237 (3d Cir. 2006), which set forth the following three-step process that district courts must use for sentencing: (1) Courts must continue to calculate a defendant's Guidelines sentence precisely as they would have before United States v. [read post]
