Search for: "State Ex Rel. Thomas v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 363
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2010, 8:33 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:50 pm
In State of California, ex rel, Xavier Becerra v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:50 pm
” In State of California, ex rel, Xavier Becerra v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 2:14 pm
The Court distinguished the instant case from the decisions by the Ninth Circuit in Milne ex rel. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
’” But in rejecting the argument based on Hawke and its reading of Article V, the majority opinion in AIRC instead relied on two other cases, Ohio ex. rel. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
” See Thomas Jefferson Univ., 512 U.S. at 512 (deferring to “an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations”). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
” See Thomas Jefferson Univ., 512 U.S. at 512 (deferring to “an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations”). [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 12:29 am
People ex. rel. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 6:59 am
Bell ex rel. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 11:40 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Leonard Thomas v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm
United States (decided five to four); United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:48 pm
State ex rel. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 4:54 pm
Because we are remanding for a new order, we need not address the fourth issue.In Thomas E. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:40 am
Petition for Writ of CertiorariBrief in OppositionReply Brief 11-420Virginia, ex rel. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
” This part of Blacker was never quoted, much less explained, by the majority or concurring opinions in the Bush litigation.In any event, if the case for ISL is to be built on Supreme Court authority, twentieth-century decisions—decisions post-Blacker—strongly undercut ISL.Consider first the 1916 case of Ohio ex rel. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
On Thomas, on Ginsburg, on Breyer, on Kagan. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
First up is United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Supreme Court … The People of the State of New York, ex rel, William Kemmler against Charles F. [read post]
