Search for: "State of California v. Superior Court"
Results 181 - 200
of 3,612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2012, 3:58 pm
Superior Court, 47 Cal. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:43 pm
This post was authored by Liara Silva and Alysha Stein-Manes Last month, the California Court of Appeal issued a decision in Caldecott v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
In the state case of California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:06 am
(DMC No.7231) (Maricopa County Superior Court No. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 7:44 am
The Superior Court of San Diego denied the Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
The court found that the real party in interest did not meet the evidentiary burden imposed by the California Supreme Court in Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm
Strauss of the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, in which Judge Strauss granted motions for summary filed by Bayer and several generic drug defendants. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
Superior Court (ARCO), no. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 10:25 pm
Superior Court (Gonzalez), No. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 12:40 pm
The Superior Court for the State of California for the County of San Diego (Hohnbaum). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:32 pm
Back in 2007, the California Supreme Court, in Gentry v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:26 am
In Wanke, Industrial, Commercial, Residential, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 4:37 pm
Cody, (ND CA, Dec. 18, 2020), a California federal district court, applying the Younger abstention doctrine, refused to issue a temporary restraining order against state court proceedings enforcing a state court's preliminary injunction against a church. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:15 am
Lastly, the court justified its decision from a California Court of Appeals holding in the 1983 Hall v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:07 pm
Superior Court, arguing that these short retention periods thwart the government transparency measures enshrined in California law and the state’s Constitution. [read post]
California Appeals Court Affirms Ruling That Section 28 Tax Does Not Apply To Surplus Lines Insurers
7 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
On September 30, 2010, the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District affirmed a superior court ruling that California Constitution Section 28 taxes do not apply to surplus lines insurers. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 1:55 pm
That state's very similar to California, and limits discovery to particular devices. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 12:07 pm
Superior Court. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm
Superior Court of Los Angeles (2018) 4 Cal.5th 903. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 10:19 am
Superior Court (October 29, 2012), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One) granted a petition for a writ filed by See's Candy after the trial court granted summary adjudication in favor of the plaintiff as to four affirmative defenses asserted in the case. [read post]
