Search for: "State of Maine v. Cross"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
The main advantage of this invention is to make it much simpler to write applications for an operating system that embodies the invention [53]. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:12 am
This post is cross-posted at Text & History. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 10:32 am
Petitioner filed a cross-application for sole custody on June 28, 2011. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:23 am
Cablevision Systems Corp. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 8:50 am
Jurist, the Deseret News and Salt Lake Tribune all have coverage of a recent petition filed by the Utah Highway Patrol asking the Court to review the question whether crosses placed next to highways in memory of deceased state troopers constitutes an unconstitutional government endorsement of religion. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 12:01 am
Mbatha v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:53 am
The main battlegrounds on the CPO stage in Merricks are on commonality and suitability, where the Supreme Court will hopefully bring clarity. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
Infringement - The de minimis principle in quia timet actionsThe de minimis principle has been considered in previous patent authorities (Hoechst v BP [1998], Monsanto v Cargill [2007], Napp v Ratiopharm [2009], Lundbeck v Norpharma [2011]). [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
In FTC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 6:52 am
State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 5:42 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
Stanford student Scott Noveck discusses oral argument in Kansas v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 11:01 am
2 out of 3 opinions were excluded by the court Facts: This case (Federal-Mogul Corporation v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in its 2019 Rucho v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
Third-party plaintiffs now appeal from an order that, inter alia, granted the motion of third-party defendants to dismiss the third-party complaint for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) and denied the cross motion of third-party plaintiffs seeking to disqualify third-party defendants from acting as counsel to plaintiffs in the main action. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:33 pm
In the recent decision Ackers v Saad Investments Co Ltd, the Federal Court undertook a careful examination of what needs to be established to satisfy one of the central concepts of the Model Law: the location of an insolvent company’s “centre of main interests” (COMI). [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:45 am
B Implied Jurisdiction Agreements Create Uncertainty for Business The main thesis of our article is that implied jurisdiction undermines the core needs of business entities engaging in cross-border commercial transactions. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 6:51 pm
Tenenbaum began with the continuing cross-examination of Dr. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:32 am
On June 26, 2024, the Supreme Court addressed that question in Murthy v. [read post]
