Search for: "State v Banks" Results 181 - 200 of 15,763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Preston Lim
The consensus, as Paul Stephan notes, is that “the assets of a sovereign central bank enjoy some kind of international legal immunity from confiscation, as opposed to freezing, by the state in which they are found. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by Donald Dinnie
In Miracle Mile Investments 67 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Standard Bank of SA Ltd2016 (2) SA 153 (GJ), the facts were similar to the dispute at hand. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:52 am by Ivan Horodyskyy
Damage to the plaintiffs’ property by the armed forces of the Russian Federation constitutes an exception to the state’s judicial immunity, in line with customary international law, which, according to the Court, is confirmed in Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts and in practice of the International Court of Justice (North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands) Case) and practice of the European Court of… [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Maggie Mills
This approach, too, begins with the frozen central bank assets. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:36 am by Orin S. Kerr
" And if the banks that gave him loans had their loans repaid, what is the harm? [read post]
Authors: Ray Giblett, James Morris, Rajaee Rouhani, Stephen Lee, Jeremy Moller, Charles Nugent-Young, Merren Taylor, Timothy Chan, Joshua Kan, Dylan Sault and Steven Li  Welcome to our first wrap up of the year! [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
On January 24, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules that impose significant additional procedural and disclosure requirements on initial public offerings (IPOs) by special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) and in business combination transactions involving SPACs (de-SPACs). [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, defendants have not met their "heavy burden" of establishing that the complaint should have been dismissed on forum non conveniens grounds (see Elmaliach v Bank of China Ltd., 110 AD3d 192, 208 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]