Search for: "State v Barrett" Results 181 - 200 of 1,917
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2021, 11:56 pm by Josh Blackman
[The Court is badly fractured, as Justice Barrett writes her first separate writing. ] Around 10:45 PM ET on Friday evening, the Supreme Court decided South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:49 am by Wanda Gomez
Photo by Steve Barrett On March 18, 2013, a Petition for Writ of Certiorari was granted in the case of United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:31 pm by Josh Blackman
[And they charge that Justices Barrett and Kavanaugh "lost the will" to decide the case. ] In Moyle v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 2:44 pm by Josh Blackman
California, the original jurisdiction case that challenged the Golden State's "travel ban. [read post]
23 May 2015, 2:09 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Page 128 Devitt, Spellman, Barrett, Callahan, Leyden & Kenney, LLP, Smithtown, N.Y. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Page 128 Devitt, Spellman, Barrett, Callahan, Leyden & Kenney, LLP, Smithtown, N.Y. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 9:29 am by Anthony O'Rourke
The Supreme Court recently granted a certiorari petition in Davis v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 5:57 am by jonathanturley
The focus of the letter is the fact that Barrett voted with the majority in the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:47 pm by Josh Blackman
In an earlier post, I wrote about Justice Barrett's concurrence in Does 1-3 v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 9:38 am by Tom Smith
In July, Kavanaugh and Barrett joined the court’s leftist majority in declining to hear Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 4:08 am by James Romoser
Meanwhile, across the street from the Capitol, the Supreme Court is closed Monday for Columbus Day, but the justices will resume their second week of oral arguments on Tuesday with arguments in United States v. [read post]