Search for: "State v. Barclay"
Results 181 - 200
of 297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2008, 3:34 am
GALLAGHER, JR., AND HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:13 am
Mirga v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; Samin v Westminster City Council, heard on 6-7 March 2015. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:16 pm
" Â Brief of the United States of America Amicus Curiae Supporting Defendant-Appellees, at 21, Khulumani v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:44 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 6:20 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Lester Smith v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:42 am
Gelboim v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 11:21 am
Barclay stated the following: [W]e believe it is consistent with the statute’s purpose to pay a contingency fee, which may be greater than an hourly fee. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 10:40 am
On February 24, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Jerry Dillon, et al. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
The Internet Cases Blog has published there articles covering significant recent cases in the United States: A summary judgment was recently awarded in favour of Chanel following the luxury brands challenge to the registrant of the domain name <chanelgraffitti.com>. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:23 am
Here's an excerpt from the Berkman Center press release: The Citizen Media Law Project (CMLP), with the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and Public Citizen, submitted an amicus curiae brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, urging the court to apply First Amendment scrutiny to the recently resurgent “hot news misappropriation” doctrine in Barclays Capital, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:44 am
The merit decision in State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 11:24 am
Jesner v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 6:57 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
Mississippi; (2) whether the Florida Supreme Court’s per se harmless-error rule for Hurst violations contravenes the Supreme Court’s decisions holding that harmless-error review cannot be “automatic and mechanical,” Barclay v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:08 am
Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:20 am
Kramarsky, a member of Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky, writes that the recent decision in Barclays Capital Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 12:38 pm
Botticella, United States District Judge R. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 1:43 pm
” (source) Not surprisingly, this "sweat of the brow" logic is reminiscent of the reasoning in Judge Cote's influential decision in Barclays v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 9:44 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 29-30 April. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
