Search for: "State v. Becker" Results 181 - 200 of 582
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2017, 6:50 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Sleepy’s, LLC, 220 N.J. 289 (2015), a New Jersey appellate panel held, in Garden State Fireworks, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 9:10 pm
Becker, Post-Conviction DNA Testing, Actual Innocence, and Cold Cases: A Practitioner's Guide to Freeing the Innocent, Exhuming the Past, and Resurrecting the Truth-Making a Case for Seeking Justice over Finality Valsamis Mitsilegas, Transnational Criminal Law and the Global Rule of Law Notes and CommentsFrancesca Ippolito, Mainstreaming Human Rights in Euro Med Bilateral Relations: "The Road to Hell Is Paved with Good Intentions" Robert Kolb, Réflexions sur le… [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
At a 2014 panel discussion, Ford’s lawyer during that period, Benton Becker, explained another part of the President’s motivation was a 1915 Supreme Court decision, Burdick v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
The distinctive dog deviceAzumi Ltd v Zuma's Choice Pet Products Ltd [2017] EWHC 609 is a case about a dog's purpose. [read post]
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et al.… [read post]
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et al.… [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:11 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Div. 1954), where a dentist removed the wrong tooth; Becker v. [read post]