Search for: "State v. Blowers"
Results 181 - 200
of 257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2009, 5:35 am
(Spicy IP) Coversyl (Perindopril) – Canada: Court of Appeal upholds Trial Division finding of patent validity and infringement: Apotex v ADIR (Pharmacapsules@Gowlings) Cozaar (Losartan) – France: French Patent Office grants paediatric extension of French SPC for Losartan (The SPC Blog) Cozaar/Hyzaar (Losartan) – US: FDA prevails in generic Cozaar/Hyzaar 180-day exclusivity forfeiture litigation: Teva Pharmaceuticals v Sebelius (FDA Law Blog) Diflucan… [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:47 pm
" U.S. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:50 pm
Thursday's suit is known as Jewel v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
6 May 2013, 10:18 am
As the court stated in footnote 21, “[O]ur opinion in this case does not affect the whistle-blower protections afforded statutorily by General Statutes § 31-51m, which are not at issue in this case. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
In Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
In Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
(iv) Protecting whistleblowers is contrary to the values and beliefs imbedded in American culture: (v) Punishing and preventing bad corporate behavior is a difficult task, depending on moral condemnation and economic pain. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:28 am
Tripp v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 5:19 pm
Likewise, the Kentucky Supreme Court held in Hill v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm
Ireland The Irish Independent reports that the High Court has ordered Twitter to identify the anonymous author of a tweet which is alleged to have defamed a whistle-blower who took part in an RTÉ Prime Time programme. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
” Wrighten v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:25 am
Employee privacy protectionsCourts have split over the protections given to text messaging, attempting to weigh the need to access communications in the ubiquitous and casually-used medium against privacy concerns.In Quon v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 11:28 am
We advised the “whistle-blower” crew members to notify the CDC. [read post]
23 May 2014, 9:22 am
In Rumsfeld v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
This concerns a claim that the Sun paid the partner of a Royal Aide for sensitive briefings and is said to be based on new Whistle Blower information. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 8:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:51 pm
In contrast, in The Environmental Group Ltd v Peter Bowd[5], a CEO claimed he was subjected to an investigation into his alleged misconduct, suspended and then sacked because he was a ‘whistle-blower’ – he had raised concerns in a report to the Board, and then lodged a complaint with ASIC, about alleged financial irregularities. [read post]
