Search for: "State v. Blowers"
Results 181 - 200
of 257
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2010, 1:48 pm
The always informative NY Public Personnel law blog on a recent whistleblower case: Arbitrator’s refusal to hear employee’s “whistle blower” defense in the course of disciplinary hearing requires the vacating of the award Arbitrator’s refusal to hear employee’s “whistle blower” defense in the course of disciplinary hearing requires the vacating of the award Matter of Kowaleski v New York State Dept.… [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:33 am
One famous opinion, from the Supreme Court of New Jersey in New Jersey Coalition Against War in the Middle East v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:11 am
His appeal to the Erie County Civil Service Commission pursuant to Section 76 of the Civil Service Law was denied.Guadagnino next filed an appeal with the Commissioner of Education pursuant to Section 310 of the Education Law contending that the school district violated federal and state law protecting “whistle blowers” by terminating him in retaliation for his making and pursuing his allegations of “inappropriate conduct. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 11:29 am
In McCaskey v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 9:56 am
’ Fuller v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 8:18 am
BIAW providing education on new state energy code Sweeping changes to the Washington State Energy Code are on their way. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:34 pm
Cloutier v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
” Wrighten v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:04 pm
The Court of Appeals upheld the summary judgment in this opinion, Chadd v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 8:43 am
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:58 am
Kindley, at his blawg, People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:31 pm
–-Fuller v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:45 am
[UPDATE: This story's gotten some national attention along with coverage generally of in-house counsel's access (or restrictions) to the protections of whistle-blower laws under various states' laws.] [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:36 am
In L G Blower Ltd v Reeves, R had made various offers at various times in varying amounts At one point all previous offers save for a 'May 2007? [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:36 am
In L G Blower Ltd v Reeves, R had made various offers at various times in varying amounts At one point all previous offers save for a 'May 2007? [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
Reputation, as Lord Nicholls explained in Reynolds v Times Newspapers, does matter, and not merely for its service to the individual concerned: ‘Reputation is an integral and important part of the dignity of the individual. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 3:46 am
In Kidwell v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 1:57 pm
These facts make up the allegations asserted by the plaintiff technician in DiLisciandro v. [read post]
