Search for: "State v. Bumper" Results 181 - 200 of 342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2011, 1:51 pm by Jim Dempsey
Supreme Court in what could be one of the major Fourth Amendment cases of the decade, U.S. v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:30 am
The Seventh Circuit stated that because it resolved the jurisdictional issue in Cunningham Charter Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
The first  was on The State of Creativity: The Future of 3D Printing, 4D Printing and Augmented Reality. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:22 am by John L. Welch
. , Serial No. 77954696 [Section 2(a) refusal of SWISS+TECH for expandable and compact multi-function hand tools and electronic devices, on the ground of geographical deceptiveness].May 8, 2012 - 10 AM: United States Postal Service v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 8:19 am
In addition to Menino's remarks, city, state, and local officials offered congratulatory citations. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Perhaps the best starting point for analysis of the compelled-speech realm remains Wooley v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by John Elwood
  Of the former bumper crop of state-on-top habeas petitions, only one remains:  Wetzel v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
  The defendant in State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:37 am by Lyle Denniston
A deputy sheriff and a state social caseworker took the issue of child interviews to the Court in a pair of cases, Camreta v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:38 pm by Greg Nojeim
Justice Breyer was particularly keen on this, and suggested at one point that maybe the Court could rule that this particular level of surveillance certainly crossed the line and required a warrant, and leave it to Congress and the legislatures of the states to draw the line about the particular circumstances in which warrants would be required in other instances.The traditional liberal/conservative split on the Court might break down on this issue, as it did in Kyllo v. [read post]