Search for: "State v. C. N."
Results 181 - 200
of 6,427
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
From Keisel v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm
From a supplement to a self-represented appellant's brief in Shaver v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
In Córdoba v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
In McCloskey v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
See Walsh v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
From Doe v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:34 am
In Malvern Panalytical Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
To test this, we classify U.S. states based on the percentage of voters who voted for the Republican or Democrat candidate in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:33 pm
”[16] However, the experience of the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) should serve as a cautionary tale. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:38 am
Code § 200(c). [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
[I]n Roer v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:41 am
State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:14 am
The Court of Appeal’s judgment in R (CAAT) v Secretary of State for International Trade [2019] EWCA Civ 1020 provides useful insight into how well-established principles of “irrationality” apply in the international arms trade context, and the extent to which the latitude afforded to the executive in this policy area affects this process. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:28 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:30 pm
+ come(v.). [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 12:22 pm
& Loan Ass’n of Chi. v. [read post]
