Search for: "State v. Carr"
Results 181 - 200
of 828
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2019, 5:29 am
It was only too bad that the event was not held after the latest decision of Mr Justice Carr in the TQ Delta v Zyxel saga was published. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
Carr. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:30 pm
Carr. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:07 am
Mr Justice Carr at [224] and [225] stated:"Insofar as this submission suggests that hindsight “cherry-picking” from the prior art is impermissible, then I agree. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Greenway Ohio, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 11:00 am
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), it had jurisdiction, that a justiciable case was stated, that Sanders had standing, and that the Democratic primary in Georgia is “state” action within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 12:14 pm
Carr in 1962.It was, of course, a dissent. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 10:54 am
Carr, the landmark 1962 case in which voters from Tennessee complained that the state’s malapportioned state legislative districts violated the equal protection clause, the Constitution has served as an effective limit on the propensity of politicians to manipulate election districts for their own political gain. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:25 am
Carr. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 11:12 am
TQ Delta v Zyxel battle continues in the UK: For those interested in some closing arguments in the latest SEP infringement/validity battle in the UK, head down to the Rolls Building end of this week for the latest stage of the TQ Delta v Zyxel litigation before Mr Justice Carr. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 8:42 am
This morning, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in Conversant Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L v Huawei Technologies Co. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:40 am
" So begins, Carr J's latest trade mark judgment in the English High Court - Pathway IP SARL v Easygroup Ltd [2018] EWHC 3608.This case was a High Court appeal from a successful application by EasyGroup to revoke two trade marks for non-use. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:09 pm
Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 266 (1962) (Stewart, J., concurring.) [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
"In addition, said the court, quoting Matter of Carr v New York State Dept. of Transp., 70 AD3d 1110, while "an employee charged with failing to possess a minimum qualification of his or her position is only entitled to notice of the charge and the opportunity to contest it", the Village in this instance offered Jakubowicz a hearing "to afford [him] the opportunity to present information to the Village why [he] should not be administratively… [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
"In addition, said the court, quoting Matter of Carr v New York State Dept. of Transp., 70 AD3d 1110, while "an employee charged with failing to possess a minimum qualification of his or her position is only entitled to notice of the charge and the opportunity to contest it", the Village in this instance offered Jakubowicz a hearing "to afford [him] the opportunity to present information to the Village why [he] should not be administratively… [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
" In addition, said the court, quoting Matter of Carr v New York State Dept. of Transp., 70 AD3d 1110, while "an employee charged with failing to possess a minimum qualification of his or her position is only entitled to notice of the charge and the opportunity to contest it", the Village in this instance offered Jakubowicz a hearing "to afford [him] the opportunity to present information to the Village why [he] should not be administratively terminated… [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
" In addition, said the court, quoting Matter of Carr v New York State Dept. of Transp., 70 AD3d 1110, while "an employee charged with failing to possess a minimum qualification of his or her position is only entitled to notice of the charge and the opportunity to contest it", the Village in this instance offered Jakubowicz a hearing "to afford [him] the opportunity to present information to the Village why [he] should not be administratively terminated… [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Schrand, 2018-Ohio-3787.Background of Mezher v. [read post]
