Search for: "State v. Crow" Results 181 - 200 of 824
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Unknown
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html Crow Tribe of Indians v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:26 am by David Bernstein
Ferguson, which gave us the racial doctrine of “separate but equal,” the case of Lochner v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:26 pm by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) As Ilya notes below, the Fifth Circuit has upheld the University of Texas’s racial and ethnic preference practices in Fisher v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:20 am by Ilya Shapiro
 Moreover, the coverage formula is a Jim Crow anachronism; the racial gap in voter registration and turnout, for example, is lower in states originally covered by Section 5 than nationwide. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:54 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Wyoming, "Whether Wyoming's admission to the Union or the establishment of the Bighorn National Forest abrogated the Crow Tribe of Indians' 1868 federal treaty right to hunt on the 'unoccupied lands of the United States,' thereby permitting the present-day criminal conviction of a Crow member who engaged in subsistence hunting for his family. [read post]
18 May 2009, 2:22 pm
This article from Politico marks the 102nd anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling Plessey v. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 3:36 am
Therefore, a forgotten but large body of cases from the Jim Crow-era holds Yick Wo categorically inapplicable to prosecutions for conduct the state has the power to criminalize. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:49 am by NCC Staff
As late as 1948, two states (Arizona and New Mexico) had laws that barred many American Indians from voting, and American Indians faced some of the same barriers as blacks, until passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1965, including Jim Crow-like tactics and poll taxes. [read post]