Search for: "State v. Crown"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2022, 10:42 am
R v Lawrence, 2002 ABPC 189 In this case, an undercover CPS officer drives down a street in downtow [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 10:31 am
First, R v Smithers, 1977 CanLII 7 (SCC), states that the Crown must prove factual causation. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Criminal Law: Sentencing; Higher than Crown RecommendationR. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 3:21 pm
" Truax v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court reversed its 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 1:26 pm
See the Supreme Court’s decision in R v Lariviere below for more information. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 10:32 am
As indicated in the case of R v Smithers, 1977 CanLII 7 (SCC) the Crown must satisfy the court that the act you committed was a “contributing cause…outside the de minimus range”. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am
Charles Moore, The Spectator: The personal faith of PMs: in brief, argues that the new PM, though a Hindu, should continue to advise the Crown on ecclesiastical appointments “so long as the C of E remains the church by law established”. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:18 am
Furthermore, a community-based sentence may be obtained even where the Crown is seeking jail time. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:56 am
For example, in the case R v MacDonald, the Supreme Court of Canada assigned no positive duty to the Crown to prove that a defendant understood his license and deliberately disobeyed it (see: R v MacDonald, 2014 SCC 3 (CanLII), [2014] 1 SCR 37). [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:12 pm
” A successful conviction for dangerous driving will require that the Crown prosecutor demonstrate two elements. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 6:09 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:47 am
” As best I can tell, there are now exactly seven appeals court decisions from three of the four Departments of the Appellate Division explicitly adopting this rule of construction of contract indemnification provisions to cover intra-party disputes unless otherwise specified in the agreement: In re Part 60 RMBS Put – Back Litig.WSA Group, PE., PC v DKI Eng’g & Consulting USA PC (178 AD3d 1320 [3d Dept 2019])Crown Wisteria, Inc. v Cibani (178… [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
R v Royal, 2022 ABCA 330 (CanLII) [12] Accordingly, when the Crown took charge of the matter at that point, the matter should have been brought to a superior court judge, not to another provincial court judge. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 10 October 2022, judgment was handed down in Driver v Crown Prosecution Service [2022] EWHC 2500 (KB). [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 4:41 pm
At last count, the backlog of cases facing the Crown Court hit 59,687, according to Ministry of Justice data released in September 2022. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 11:21 am
The court in R. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 9:18 am
The way the Crown elects to proceed depends largely on the facts of the case. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am
That article is cited in the Justice Gorsuch's dissent in Oklahoma v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 4:34 am
” For example, in Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., Inc. (164 AD2d 737 [1st Dept 1991], affd 78 NY2d 572 [1991]), the Court ruled that an out-of-state judgment by confession is entitled to accelerated treatment under CPLR 3213. [read post]
