Search for: "State v. D. A. R." Results 181 - 200 of 16,100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2015, 7:36 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the updated materials in the case now captioned Grand Canyon Skywalk Development LLC v Cieslak (D. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:29 am by sally
Regina (Elam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 29; [2012] WLR (D) 14 “The licence expiry date applicable to a prisoner serving consecutive terms of imprisonment including at least one term of 12 months or more was to be determined by the provisions of section 264(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 unless all the offences for which the sentences were imposed had been committed before section 264 came into force on 4 April 2005; in such a case, section… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:50 am by sally
Miguel v State of Trinidad and Tobago [2011] UKPC 14; [2011] WLR (D) 198 “A constitutional provision which exempted both existing laws and enactments which altered existing laws from its protection did not extend to an enactment which altered a law that had existed before the Constitution came into force but had since been abolished. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 3:52 am by sally
Regina (Modaresi) v Secretary of State for Health and others [2011] EWCA Civ 1359; [2011] WLR (D) 340 “The 14-day period allowed to a detained mental patient to lodge an application with the Mental Health Review Tribunal as provided by section 66 of the Mental Health Act 1983 and rule 32(1) the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) Rules 2008 was not to be considered to have expired where, though sent by fax on the last… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:02 am by sally
Mohamed (Azza) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 331; [2012] WLR (D) 92 “The use of the superlative form in the phrase “the most exceptional compassionate circumstances” in paragraph 317(i)(e) of the Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules (1994) stressed how extreme such circumstances had to be in order for an applicant to be granted indefinite leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom as the parent or grandparent aged… [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:42 pm by Joseph Allen
Three events boosted our economic turnaround in the 1980's: the passage of Bayh-Dole, which injected the incentives of patent ownership into the federal R&D system; the enactment of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which insured the courts would apply the patent law consistently; and the Supreme Court's ruling in Diamond v Chakraberty that living organisms could be patented. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:00 am by Eric Halliday, Rachael Hanna
District Court for the Western District of Washington, temporarily prevented those items from being removed from the USML on March 6 by issuing a preliminary nationwide injunction in State of Washington v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
(…) In the meantime, Heller filed for bankruptcy under chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 1:32 am
High Court (Administrative Court) British Medical Association, & Anor R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2008] EWHC 599 (Admin) (13 March 2008) Slivka v District Court of Prague [2008] EWHC 595 (Admin) (12 March 2008) Secretary of State for Justice, R (on the application of) v Mental Health Review Tribunal & Anor [2008] EWHC 598 (Admin) (05 March 2008) D, R (on the application of)… [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 7:23 am by Tracy Thomas
Anthony, Federal Judicial Center (2005) United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:53 am by sally
IR (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; GT (Libya) v Same; AN (Pakistan) v Same; AK (Pakistan) v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 704; [2011] WLR (D) 206 “In national security deportation and exclusion cases before the Special Immigration Appeals Commission foreign nationals were entitled to the standard of procedural fairness contained in the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Procedure) Rules 2003, neither more nor less. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:50 am by tracey
RB (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: [2012] EWCA Civ 277;  [2012] WLR (D)  77 “Analysis of an asylum seeker’s speech carried out by a private Swedish company was admissible in asylum proceedings although the analysts were allowed to remain anonymous and the presentation of the evidence did not comply in a number of respects with practice directions for the immigration and asylum chambers of the First-tier and Upper… [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 2:37 am by tracey
Regina (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 681;  [2011] WLR (D)  190 “When deciding whether to grant leave to remain in the United Kingdom to a non-EEA economic migrant it was not open to the Secretary of State to treat the certificate of sponsorship issued by the migrant’s employer as invalid in reliance on the fact that the migrant’s job fell below the relevant NVQ/SVQ level specified in… [read post]