Search for: "State v. Doherty"
Results 181 - 200
of 227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2010, 3:25 am
See Doherty v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:21 am
Specifically the High Court stated as follows: [82] The issue addressed in the passage from Gordon v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
A letter was sent to Ms W stating the conclusion but giving no reasons. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
A letter was sent to Ms W stating the conclusion but giving no reasons. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:17 am
Third, amidst the usual welter of authorities being discussed, it was particularly interesting to see the Irish cases (Donegan v Dublin CC [2008] IEHC 288; Dublin CC v Gallagher [2008] IEHC 354) being drawn on in this context, although they are a bit of a sideshow. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 2:56 pm
In R. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:46 am
Appointing authority’s decision to dismiss a probationary employee found to have violated Department rules sustainedAbreu v Doherty, 63 AD3d 490The New York City Department of Sanitation terminated Cristobal Abreu before he had completed his maximum period of probation. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:30 am
At Reason.com, Brian Doherty discusses the Court’s recent decision to grant the NRA’s motion for divided argument in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:35 am
Doherty v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 4:06 am
Dismissed worker terminated after §75 hearing held in absentia for being AWOL due to incarceration ordered reinstated following acquittal of chargesSilberzweig v Doherty, 23 Misc 3d 618*As framed by New York State Supreme Court Justice Alice Schlesinger, “This CPLR Article 78 proceeding commenced by Matthew Silberzweig, a former employee of the Department of Sanitation, against the Sanitation Commissioner presents an "interesting" question:"Was it… [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
Law.com Technology Editor Sean Doherty previews the advances expected to share the spotlight at LegalTech New York, being held Feb. 1-3. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:16 pm
The latest issue of the libertarian magazine Reason has an interesting essay by Brian Doherty on the briefing in McDonald v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:48 am
the decisions in Qazi, Kay and Doherty. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:16 am
Zehentner v Austria, a judgment of the First Section of the European Court of Human Rights, demonstrates yet again that the ECHR has a different approach to mandatory rights to possession than the House of Lords has expressed in the trilogy of cases (Buckley, Connors, McCann and Cosic against Qazi, Kay, Doherty). [read post]
