Search for: "State v. Dyson"
Results 181 - 200
of 268
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
Smith v Evans (or Smith v Buckland) had found that ‘the public law defence is based on conventional public law grounds, that is to say that the decision to recover possession was so unreasonable that no reasonable public authority could have made it’ (Dyson LJ at para 40). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:00 pm
TM (Zimbabwe) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 916 – Read judgment Is it reasonable to expect an asylum seeker on their return to their home country to lie about their political beliefs and thereby avoid persecution? [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm
In O’Rourke v Camden LBC (1998) AC 188, the H [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 6:34 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
The Court of Appeal had struck out parts of the claim in December on the grounds of the former King’s state immunity. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
On 10 December 2020 a unilateral Statement in Open Court was read before Nicklin J, after Sir James and Lady Deirdre Dyson accepted an offer of amends in relation to false and defamatory claims made by the Daily Mail in an article published in 2019 as it reported on a legal dispute between the Dysons and their former housekeeper. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
Secretary of state for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Michelle Donelan welcomed President Biden’s executive order implementing the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 4:33 am
According to the recent Generics v Teva/Yeda decision, the burden of proof should therefore be on the alleged infringer, not the patentee. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
On Thursday 6 October 2022 there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Sir James Dyson and Ors v Channel 4 News. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:01 pm
Specifically, the DWP argued that the FTT (a) They had applied the wrong test for justification (b) They had not followed the decision of the Court of Appeal in R(MA and Others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2014] PTSR 584. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:15 pm
In last week’s judgment in Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [2012] UKSC 22, the Supreme Court decided that the words ‘judicial authority’ in s 2(2) of the Extradition Act 2003 include prosecutors as well as courts. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 11:52 am
Using the language of Dyson LJ in AMEC Capital Projects Ltd v Whitefriars City Estates Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 1535, “something more is required”, which must be “something of substance”. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On 26 July 2022, there were hearings in Dyson v MGN Limited before Nicklin J and Smith -v- Baker and another before Griffiths J. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
Reserved Judgments Nagi v Sinniah Santhiramoulesan, heard 22 and 23 January 2024 (Collins Rice J) Sinton v Maybourne Hotels Limited, heard 19 and 20 December 2023 (Chamberlain J) Dyson v Channel 4, heard 15 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Amersi v BBC, heard 8 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Wilson v Mendelsohn and others, heard 4 to 8 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC)… [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm
On 15 January 2020, Nicol J will heard the trial in the case of Dyson v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 2:40 am
Comparison was made to Dyson v Hoover [2001] where the skilled person’s thinking was “bag-ridden” to the extent they were “blind” to the idea of using a cyclone instead of a bag, or at least prejudiced against it. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 1:28 pm
In the courts Keyu v. [read post]
