Search for: "State v. Eady"
Results 181 - 200
of 285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
As Mr Eadie points out, that is inevitably the case when policy is cast in broad terms, and it is well established that ‘bright line’ rules are necessarily to some degree arbitrary but that does not render them disproportionate. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
As Mr Eadie points out, that is inevitably the case when policy is cast in broad terms, and it is well established that ‘bright line’ rules are necessarily to some degree arbitrary but that does not render them disproportionate. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm
This decision was the subject of a number of reports including in the Press Gazette and the Independent On 30 March 2017 Sir David Eady handed down judgment on the damages assessment case of Harrath v Stand for Peace [2017] EWHC 653 (QB). [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am
The Legal Satyricon blog has a post about United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Murphy v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
On 12 and 13 December 2012, the appeal in Rothschild v Associated Newspapers was heard by the Court of Appeal (Laws, McCombe LJJ and Eady J). [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Even when modernizing the law of comment (WIC Radio & Mair v Simpson [2008] 2 SCR 420) and creating a new “public interest responsible communication” defence (Grant v Torstar Corp [2009] SCC 61) the court failed to take the step of importing Charter analysis or standards into the common law[12] As to the English solution of Reynolds, Eady J comments sadly that the Reynolds defence “seems hardly ever to be used in litigation. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
Johnson v Steele, heard 29 October 2014 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:40 am
” Lord Neuberger also raised the question of whether anonymous speech is even capable of protection in the Internet age, and remarked on Mr Justice Eady’s conclusions in Author of a Blog v Times Newspapers Ltd [2009] EWHC 1358 (QB), that bogging is a public activity with no reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am
For example, in Quinton v Peirce & Cooper ([2009] EWHC 912 (QB)), where a DPA claim was added to libel and malicious falsehood claims, Eady J said: “I must now turn to the Data Protection Act. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm
On the same day Dingemans J gave judgment in Lokhova v Tymula ([2016] EWHC 225 (QB))(heard 26 and 27 January 2016). [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
On the same day Sir David Eady refused a number of applications in the case of Otuo v Morley. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
There was also a costs hearing in the case of Decker v Hopcraft before Sir David Eady. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
United States In the case of Simorangkir v Courtney Love Cobain the Court of Appeal of the State of California dismissed an appeal by Courtney Love seeking to have the case dismissed under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:16 pm
United States U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 4:38 pm
On 30 June 2015 judgment was handed down by Sir David Eady in the cases of Ma v St George’s Healthcare Trust ([2015] EWHC 1866 (QB)). [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
On 10 May 2012, Eady J handed down judgment in the case of Hunt v Times Newspapers [2012] EWHC1220 (QB). [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:15 pm
At Mr Mosley’s privacy trial in 2008, Mr Justice Eady determined that there was no public interest in the exposé. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:02 am
” This passage is substantially similar to paragraph 50 in the first instance decision by Eady J in McKennitt v Ash which was approved by the Court of Appeal in that case in December 2006. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:05 am
Hutcheson (formerly known as “KGM”) v News Group Newspapers, heard 24 May 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Etherton and Gross LJJ) Caplin v Associated Newspapers Ltd, heard 26 May 2011 (Sharp J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley & ors, heard 7-8 June 2011 (Eady J) [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
Cooper v Turrell, heard 24 November 2011 (Tugendhat J) McKeown v Attheraces Ltd, heard 28 November 2011 (Eady J) Phillips v NGN, heard 28 and 29 November 2011 (Judge CJ, Neuberger MR, Kay V-P) El-Naschie v Macmillan, heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011 (Sharp J) Also on Inforrm last week News: Defamation in Israel – are the proposed amendments to the law objectionable? [read post]
