Search for: "State v. Eady" Results 181 - 200 of 285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am by INFORRM
Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and Council, implemented in the United Kingdom by the Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002, requires member states to take steps to ensure the free movement of information society services between member states. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On Sunday, Guido Fawkes released a preview of Alastair Campbell’s evidence to the Inquiry, stating that he had acquired it by “legal means”. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On 16 November 2011, Mr Justice Eady gave judgment in the case of Al-Baho v Meerza [2011] EWHC (QB). [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am by NL
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am by NL
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Jefferies co-authored a letter to the Guardian last Monday, stating that CFA reforms would “effectively remove the opportunity of people of ordinary means to seek redress when they have been libelled or intruded upon, or where they need to defend a libel claim”. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
, has expressed concern, stating: “Matters of such public importance and interest should be allowed to be discussed freely and with the highest degree of legal protection.” Next week in the courts On Monday 31 October 2011, the trial of El Naschie v MacMillan Publishers Ltd will begin before Sharp J (without a jury). [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 12:16 am by INFORRM
The interests of our readers are reflected in the top ten posts of the past three months which are as follows: The MP and the “Super-Injunction” – rumour, myth and distortion (again) Harassment and injunctions: Cheryl Cole – Natalie Peck Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Opinion: “CTB and Imogen Thomas, Eady versus the Tabloid Press? [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:53 pm by INFORRM
“Watson quoted [Mr Justice] Eady saying, ‘The lack of action displays a remarkable state of affairs at News International“. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:12 am by Rosalind English
The Court dismissed the appeal and upheld Eady J’s judgment below. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The surveillance aspects to these orders follow the precedent set in Howlett v Holding [2006] EWHC 41 (QB) where Eady J stated: Holding has revealed that he has had Mrs Howlett watched at various times and wishes to retain his right to do so, whatever anxiety and distress that may cause her [16]. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
The rule however may not survive much longer as its pre-determined outcome does not reflect the balancing of the competing values and Articles – under the Human Rights Act and the European Convention, as noted by Eady J. in his recent speech at the City University and see Sunderland Housing Company v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am by Graeme Hall
The Vale of Glamorgan Council v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1532 (Admin) (16 June 2011): Council fails in challenge to closure if Barry Magistrates Court in Wales – wider victory for court closures plans. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:05 am by INFORRM
Hutcheson (formerly known as “KGM”) v News Group Newspapers, heard 24 May 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Etherton and Gross LJJ) Caplin v Associated Newspapers Ltd, heard 26 May 2011 (Sharp J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley & ors, heard 7-8 June 2011 (Eady J) [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am by INFORRM
  He noted that, because of his conclusion on reasonable expectation of privacy, this strictly speaking did not arise but nevertheless went on to state his finding. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am by Graeme Hall
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 (08 June 2011): No error of law deporting Bangladeshi man convicted of complicity in shooting. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:50 pm by INFORRM
Hutcheson (formerly known as “KGM”) v News Group Newspapers, heard 24 May 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Etherton and Gross LJJ) Caplin v Associated Newspapers Ltd, heard 26 May 2011 (Sharp J) Lord Ashcroft KCMG v Foley & ors, heard 7-8 June 2011 (Eady J) Cook v Telegraph Media Ltd, heard 9 June 2011 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 5:39 pm by INFORRM
Eady J was clear that the injunction still served a purpose in protecting the claimant and his family stating “The principle, however, is clear. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Poor Gary Flitcroft was something of a standard bearer when he sought his injunction in A v B almost a decade ago. [read post]