Search for: "State v. Engle"
Results 181 - 200
of 210
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 6:19 pm
., v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 11:16 am
The Taylor court criticized the Engle Homes v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 5:08 pm
N Engl J Med 2002;347:555--60. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 10:24 am
A state court jury in St. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:05 am
Ford Motor Co., 113 P.3d 82, 94-95 (Cal. 2005) (applying Campbell to reject "aggregate disgorgement"); Engle v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Additionally, the state health officer (a physician) made a statement directed at consumers and retailers (restaurants, grocery stores): “I hope you will purchase irradiated chicken and ground beef as they become available. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Engle v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
We just got back - well, one of us, anyway - from the latest ALI Members' Consultative Group ("MCG") meeting concerning the Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation (which we'll call "PLAL" for short). [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 11:54 pm
Additionally, respected public health organizations worldwide have reviewed the data, and every major group has stated that food irradiation is a potential tool to protect the public health. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
Where does irradiation of food fit into this evolving continuum including the new rule in the United States for lettuce and spinach? [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
Where does irradiation of food fit into this evolving continuum including the new rule in the United States for lettuce and spinach? [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Separately, the State of Oregon Public Health Division (ODPH) also noted a small cluster of E. coli infections that day. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 10:51 am
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:20 pm
L’Engle, however, belongs in no such group. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
V. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 2:56 pm
V. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 10:15 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Rex Michael Engle v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 5:57 pm
And so for the Court of Appeal to conclude by holding that "[s]ince Engle accepted a section 998 offer to compromise that was silent on costs and fees, and she prevailed on statutory causes of action for which fees may be recovered, she was entitled to costs and fees" (emphasis added), and to state that it was (as a matter of law) an abuse of discretion to deny fees, is wrong.As well as bad law. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 1:21 am
The suit, Byers v. [read post]
