Search for: "State v. Erwin" Results 181 - 200 of 407
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Kali Borkoski
United States, holding that increasing sentences under the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act violates the Constitution, and Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving a “meaty Speech or Debate clause” issue. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Even knowing falsehoods about large groups likely protected, too: Given United States v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:02 pm
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1094 n.14 (8th Cir. 1973) (likewise); Erwin Chemerinsky, Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies 1043-45 (4th ed. 2011); Laurence Tribe, Constitutional Law, §12-17, at 926; Toni M. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am by Amy Howe
  In Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:30 am by SHG
Chemerinsky notes in the cert petition that 9th Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski wrote in his dissent from denial of en banc review in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 2:55 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday morning the Court heard oral arguments in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:28 am by Amy Howe
In California Lawyer, Erwin Chemerinsky previews the new October Term 2014. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am by Amy Howe
At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost reviews The Case Against the Supreme Court, the new book by Erwin Chemerinsky. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Erwin Chemerinsky’s important new book, The Case Against the Supreme Court (Penguin, 2014), minces few words. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 4:29 am by Amy Howe
” In Slate, Dahlia Lithwick interviews Erwin Chemerinsky about his new book, The Case Against the Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:13 am by Amy Howe
At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen discusses the amicus brief filed by the State and Local Legal Center in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]