Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 181 - 200 of 8,986
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2011, 5:07 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Judge Hayes of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California today issued this ruling on the dispositive motions in Martin v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
  After the first opinion was published in late 2018 at 30 Cal.App.5th 630 (see my December 26, 2018 post on that decision here), the Supreme Court granted and transferred the cause back to the Third District for reconsideration in light of its opinion in Friends of Eel River v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 2:41 pm by Gail Whittemore
If the supreme court upholds this decision, there could be very positive and dramatic consequences in states all over the country where gerrymandering has happened. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 11:57 am by Joel R. Brandes
The district court found that Petitioner failed to establish that the Court had subject matter jurisdiction over her claim. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 10:41 am by Josh Blackman
On Friday, Chief Judge David Godbey of the Northern District of Texas informed Senator Schumer that his court would not adopt the Judicial Conference's "guidance. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 7:30 am by Robert Brammer
The United States District Court for the District of Maryland found that the decision to use burn pits was made by the military. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am by NCC Staff
Madison, the Supreme Court established its power of judicial review. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm by Ken Klukowski
The post Gerrymandering symposium: Janus-like judicial restraint in political gerrymanders and the census appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:45 pm by MBettman
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
First, the claims against the State Defendants are based solely on judicial acts preformed by judges in their judicial capacity. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:34 am by Guest Author
United States, the Court’s first opportunity to squarely interpret the Sixteenth Amendment in the age of originalism. [read post]