Search for: "State v. Freedom of Information Commission" Results 181 - 200 of 1,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2016, 3:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"Freedom of speech is, of course, a right secured by the Constitution against state action. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:05 am by Liah Caravalho
The event will mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:14 am by Helen Klein
Professor Glazier notes that, as a result of the 2001 AUMF and subsequent MCA, “the government purports to have the freedom of choice between military commissions and federal courts for the trial of almost any accused terrorist. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 2:54 am by INFORRM
Furthermore, the rights of the family members in such cases may be sufficiently protected by other laws that already exist to protect the Article 8 rights of living persons, such as the tort of misuse of private information in the United Kingdom (see Editions Plon v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:17 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Regulatory Bulletin    http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/regulatory/2017.htmlWe feature proposed amendments of the Indian Gaming Commission relating to the Freedom of Information Act. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:17 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Regulatory Bulletin    http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/regulatory/2017.htmlWe feature proposed amendments of the Indian Gaming Commission relating to the Freedom of Information Act. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the case of David Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and three interveners ([2014] EWHC 255 (Admin)) the High Court rejected all the arguments supporting David Miranda’s application for judicial review of his detention at Heathrow Airport in August last year. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm by Roy Ginsburg
  Regards, Roy] Introduction On January 11, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued what commentators have hailed as a “sweeping” decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:20 am by Kim Colby
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the court set Smith to one side. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
  The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
  The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:19 pm by Andis Kaulins
Jos Dumortier http://www.lawfort.be | For further information about DG Enterprise: European Commission - Enterprise and Industry DG, Information and Documentation Centre, BREY 5/150, B - 1049 Brussels, Fax: +32 (0)2 296 99 30, Website http://www.eu.int/comm/dgs/enterprise/index_en.htm). [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:00 am by INFORRM
In the words of the ECtHR “this amounts to requiring excessing and impracticable forethought capable of undermining freedom of the right to impart information on the Internet” [82] [Wow!]. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 12:03 pm by Unknown
Because the SEC has not submitted a single record since the initial request in June 2022, the plaintiff claims the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) has been violated and demands the SEC: (1) conduct a reasonable search for all non-exempt records; (2) be enjoined from continuing to withhold non-exempt records; (3) be provided a reasonable deadline to comply with the records request; and (4) award the plaintiff reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs (Virtu Financial, Inc.… [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am by Michael Douglas
Background The Australian Information Commission is Australia’s ‘independent national regulator for privacy and freedom of information’, which promotes and upholds Australians’ rights to access government-held information and to have their personal information protected. [read post]