Search for: "State v. Gales"
Results 181 - 200
of 338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2017, 6:40 am
To the contrary, Judge Gale stated, the plaintiff’s claim became moot only when the plaintiff decided to dismiss his claims seeking damages. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 6:40 am
To the contrary, Judge Gale stated, the plaintiff’s claim became moot only when the plaintiff decided to dismiss his claims seeking damages. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:22 am
Judge Gale did that in an Order in McKinnon v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
Gale's instructions. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:33 am
Tuschman for this post, which was originally published on EBG’s Florida Employment & Immigration Law Blog] An employee claiming Whistleblower protection under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act must have actually believed that his company’s conduct was illegal in order to state a claim under the Act, according to a recent decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Gale v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm
Bennett Capers's "The Crime of Loving: Loving, Lawrence, and Beyond," which appears in Loving v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 10:45 am
Short pieces:For trans migrants forced to flee their homes, the violence continues at our border (HRF Blog, March 2024) [text]- Focuses on the US-Mexico border.Queer Asylum History: Forced Displacement and Statelessness (Refugee Action, Feb. 2024) [text]- Focuses on North Africa.Revisiting CEDAW Committee’s decision in A.S. v Denmark: Legalization of Homophobia in Uganda and the Need for a Rights-Based Assessment of Asylum Application (RLI Blog, March 2024) [text]Reports & journal… [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 1:43 pm
The court stated in its judgment that DMG relied in particular on Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75.In Jameel Lord Phillips MR stated [at 54]:“An abuse of process is of concern not merely to the parties but to the court. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 5:41 pm
A recent case, Gale v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 5:41 pm
A recent case, Gale v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 11:33 am
Facts: This case (Jim David Wagoner v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: Nearly thirty years ago Justice Scalia’s Tanner lectures identified Holy Trinity Church v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 6:49 am
Gale).The Jones v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 6:28 am
Jones v Gale. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:37 am
In State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
His dissent ten years later in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:56 am
" United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
The standard of proof is not stringent, amounting only to some firsthand confirmation of the facts" (Joosten v Gale, 129 AD2d 531, 535 [1st Dept 1987]; see Martinez v Reiner, 104 AD3d 477, 478 [1st Dept 2013]; Beltre v Babu, 32 AD3d 722, 723 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
